This quarter, most of my blogs have been conceived off of independent thoughts and experiences outside of the class room. Only my entry The New "Huckleberry Finn" Eliminates the "N"-Word was based off of discussion in class. I think that is one area that I could improve on for next semester. Also, some of my other entries are a little short, like Musical Stereotypes and Rich vs. Poor. I think short entries can still spark thought among readers, but it is also important to do research on your idea to back it up in your entry. I realize that I had this problem last quarter, and now that I have been refreshed on it I plan to change it. Doing research and adding links can also attract readers outside of AS, and it would be exciting to see my blog being read by outsiders on the Internet. Some topics in my blog I believe have kind of shallow thought, like Advancing Technology and Musical Stereotypes, because they are not particularly discussing society or culture, but they are still interesting to read. Advancing Technology received three comments, which is the most amount of comments from the whole quarter. I have to be honest, blogging became less of a habit for me this quarter than it was in the previous quarter, and I found myself struggling this very morning making sure I had enough blogs. However, most of the blogs aren't rushed.
In my entry called Kissing the Chicken, I believe it was interesting enough of a topic to move forward in discussing it, but I left it up to the readers to come up with ideas for the ending question. This would be OK, except no one has responded yet. I would love for the video that is the topic of discussion to be analyzed more by my peers, but maybe I should have given a few more examples in the entry.
I think my best post this quarter has been "How to Trick People into Thinking You're Good-looking"... really society? because it poses an interesting question at the end after a whole entry of taking one side. It turns the tables a little bit. Also, I think it's particularly appealing to high school students because many highschoolers worry about their image too much, and the post and video deal with that a lot.
Monday, January 17, 2011
Musical Stereotypes
"How to Trick People into Thinking You're Good-looking"... really society?
The other day, my friend sent me a youtube video titled "How to Trick People into Thinking You're Good-looking." Although the video was very humorous and entertaining, I couldn't help but be bothered by the general message. The video is obviously superficial, which you can see from the title, but it was also very degrading to women. The girl that made the video attempts to make herself look better, but immediately associates that with looking like a "street-walker" or "stripper." She even says, before putting on her make-up, that "the goal is to make yourself look NOTHING like yourself." This detriments the need we all have to be ourselves, and can lead a girl watching this video to believe that in order to seem appealing, she has to cake on make-up and bleach her hair, taking on the look of a stripper.
The girl in the video also states as one of her steps "Go out and get a job that is super degrading. I picked dancing in my underwear." Regardless of whether she is or is not a stripper, the message she is sending across is very appalling. She then goes on to say, "To pump myself up for work, I like to cry over my Master's degree." This implies that in order to be attractive as a woman, you have to throw away the hard work you've done in school and in your activities, and become a stripper. We can all see how the message of this video is insulting. Every person is attractive in different ways, but this girl's ideas must stem from somewhere. Do you think that what she says is somewhat true in society?Here is the video. Just a heads-up, it's inappropriate, but is necessary to watch if you want to comment back.
The New "Huckleberry Finn" Eliminates the "N"-word
In class, we have been discussing the new version of Huckleberry Finn, and how it has replaced every "n-word" with "slaves." The reason for this was that the character's takes on slaves was too controversial for some class rooms, and in order for the book to keep its place, the content must be removed. I, however, don't agree with this. The use of the "n"-word may be controversial, but it is an important piece of the book that shows what the times were like when it was written. Without this, it takes a certain racial component out of the novel that is vital to studying the story and analyzing it.

The use of this word in the book is offensive, but can spark discussion in class rooms on how the "n"-word should never be used in the 21st century. Purifying any book that has the "n"-word in it could make it so children and young adults never have this important conversation in their classroom.
What do you think?
The use of this word in the book is offensive, but can spark discussion in class rooms on how the "n"-word should never be used in the 21st century. Purifying any book that has the "n"-word in it could make it so children and young adults never have this important conversation in their classroom.
What do you think?
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Kissing the Chicken
The other day surfing the Internet, I came across a Youtube Video that really amazed me. The video is an interview of a reformed Ku Klux Klan member talking about a specific instance involving Reverend Wade Watts, who was a collaborator with Martin Luther King Jr. and the state leader for the NAACP. The former KKK member, Johnny Lee Clary, speaks of how the KKK would attempt to terrorize the Reverend, and each time they tried, he would counter it with genuine love and acceptance of the Klan. For example, Johnny led about 30 members of the KKK to a restaurant where Rev. Watts was dining, and after telling him that they were going to do to him exactly what he did to the chicken he was eating, Watts picked up the chicken and kissed it. This was such a hilarious incident, that even members of the KKK were laughing. It amazed me from Clary's stories how tolerant the Reverend was of Johnny, and that he fought off hate and torment by showing that it didn't bother him at all. It got me thinking to what this way of countering harassment could also work for. Any ideas?
Monday, January 10, 2011
Cyber-Bullying
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Advancing Technology
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Rich vs. Poor
Lately, I've been thinking about why some poor people have resentment towards richer people. It was hard to make sense of at first, but I came up with the idea that maybe some impoverished populations equate money with happiness, so they resent the rich thinking they have no problems, or that they are at least trivial. In America, it is common for the rich and poor to be separated, so that not much contact exists. However, on a recent business trip to Rio, Brazil, my Dad said that hundreds of impoverished people filled the streets that also contained the richest buildings. Does this sort of arrangement in society improve the relationship between rich and poor or worsen it?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

